Pages

This student put 50 million stolen research articles online. And they’re free.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/eA8V8J This student put 50 million stolen research articles online. And they're free. via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1RzMJXd

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

New Colorado bill would reduce the penalty for an underage teen who sexts, from a form of child pornography to making it a class two misdemeanor for electronically "distributing, displaying... publishing... or possessing, a sexually explicit image of himself or herself or of another juvenile.

A proposed law in Colorado is raising new questions about how to punish teens who engage in sexting. The measure would downgrade the offense from a felony to a misdemeanor, but some worry the softer penalty could turn more youngsters into law breakers, reports CBS News correspondent Vinita Nair.

Julie and Will Piller of Lafayette, Colorado say their kids have told them sexting is just part of modern teenage life.

"It's more widespread than I think we'd like to think it is," Julie said.

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

LA proposes taxing pot to fund housing for homeless

Last month, Los Angeles city officials approved a nearly $2 billion plan to solve its homelessness crisis by building more housing with support services for residents over the next decade.

Now the question is: how is the city going to pay for this?

The city's budget analysts have narrowed their top funding ideas to nine. Several proposals involve new taxes and fees that would require voter approval. Among them is a plan to tax the sales and cultivation of medical marijuana at 15 percent, which would generate about $16.7 million a year. More revenue could come if the state decides to legalize recreational pot and the city decides to tax that too.

The idea that would create the most funds is a proposed $1 billion bond issue which would need the backing of two-thirds of voters to pass. The city would pay back the loan back investors over 30 years through property taxes. The cost to home owners? That would add about $51 to the tax bill for a $328,000 home in Los Angeles.

What all the proposals have in common is that they would be new funding sources. The ctChief Administrative Officer Miguel Santana told council members Wednesday that's the only way the city can provide enough housing for city's homeless population, which has climbed 12 percent in two years.

"Even as our economy improves, we do not anticipate to have an additional $1.78 billion over the next 10 years to dedicate for this purpose," Santana said.

What's also clear is that, given the size of the city's homelessness crisis, a combination of resources is needed.

A couple proposals need only the approval of the Council and the mayor. Among them: a one-time payment that developers would make on new project, which would go toward building below-market-rate housing. This so-called "housing linkage" fee will be the subject of a $500,000 study that the city is planning to undertake this year.

Another idea is requiring developers to build housing for lower-income residents, and if they don't want to, they could pay a fee instead.

"In turn the city would be able to take those fees and develop affordable housing elsewhere," said Sharon Tso, the chief legislative analyst.

It's unknown how much the fee would generate, but council member Mike Bonin, whose Westside district includes Venice, expressed concern over the idea.

"I'd be very reluctant to see an in-lieu fee that would get people out of building affordable housing in the coastal zone and the wealthier areas of town," Bonin said. "I think we need to have affordable housing everywhere."

Advocates for the business community and the homeless alike told council members Wednesday that whatever they choose, they should act now.

"Go big, go big and go together," said Chris Ko of the United Way. "[Homelessness] is the top issue that voters want to see the city take action on."

Here are some other ideas before the city:

  • Real estate document fee: Fees would be charged on things like financing statements and discharges of mortgages. State law caps such fees at $225. Estimated revenue is $30 million.
  • Raising the tax on real estate sales: This so-called "documentary transfer" tax is already made at time of a property sale. City staff is suggesting raising the current rate from $2.25 to $4.50 for every $500 of the sales price. Doing so could make the city an additional $167 million a year.
  • City sales tax: Adding 0.25 percent to the sales tax would net about $122 million, according to a 2012 study done for the city.
  • Parcel tax: Instead of taxing a property on its assessed value, the city would tax a property, or parcel, at a fixed amount. If you assess $10 per parcel, the estimated annual revenue would be $7.8 million.
  • Billboard tax: A 12 percent tax on billboards could generate $24 million for the city. But budget analysts acknowledge that this is a "volatile" revenue source because it's dependent on advertising sales, which ebb and flow.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/1V8purG LA proposes taxing pot to fund housing for homeless via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1UVMHid

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

U.S. states to dissolve cancer charities accused of misusing funds

"'Twenty-five years later,' Foster said, 'this nationwide cooperative effort has finally put these fraudsters out of business.'"

It took them 25 YEARS to get this done? Some of them gave as little as 5% to their aid, how do we not have something in place to require a minimum % or shut them down immediately?

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/eA8V8J U.S. states to dissolve cancer charities accused of misusing funds via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1q2yy6n

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Since 2000, at least 143 people in Minnesota have died after being shot, tased or restrained by a police officer. To date, not a single officer has been charged in any of those deaths.

Since 2000, at least 143 people in Minnesota have died after being shot, Tased or restrained by a police officer. To date, not a single officer has been charged in any of those deaths.

In 134 decisions, a grand jury, county attorney or the U.S. attorney determined there wasn't probable cause of a crime being committed.

Decisions not to charge or indict an officer are often interpreted to mean the officer was justified in using deadly force under state statute, which says it's legal if the officer felt they or a bystander were at risk of being killed or seriously hurt.

In Ramsey County people serving on a grand jury are instructed that they don't have to return an indictment, even if they do find probable cause of a crime, if they think the charges would not result in a conviction at trial.

Five recent fatal police shootings in Minnesota remain under investigation. A grand jury decision is expected shortly in the case of Derek Wolfsteller, a mentally ill man that Plymouth police Officer Amy Therkelsen shot in the head last summer when he reportedly grabbed for her gun in an Arby's.

A handful of deaths were never reviewed for charges because a medical examiner determined the person's death wasn't due to an officer's use of force but by something else, such as accidentally swallowing a bag of cocaine or "excited delirium."

Excited delirium is a condition where someone becomes extraordinarily aggressive and even psychotic, often when on cocaine or methamphetamine.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/eA8V8J Since 2000, at least 143 people in Minnesota have died after being shot, tased or restrained by a police officer. To date, not a single officer has been charged in any of those deaths. via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/21TCbXI

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Man fatally shot by Ariz. police officer begged for life

Attorney Marc J. Victor and Laney Sweet react after a judge allows Mesa police Officer Philip "Mitch" Brailsford to remain out of custody. Brailsford is charged with 2nd degree murder in the death of Daniel Shaver. Garrett Mitchell/The Republic

PHOENIX — A Texas man fatally shot by a Mesa police officer in January was heard begging for his life moments before his death, according to a police report released Tuesday morning.

A witness and a transcription of officer video footage describe Daniel Shaver saying "Please don't shoot me" and "Please don't shoot," just before an officer later identified as Philip "Mitch" Brailsford unloaded his service weapon.

Brailsford has been charged with second-degree murder and was terminated from the Police Department.

On Tuesday, the Mesa Police Department released the police report, 911 calls and other material from its investigation of Brailsford's shooting of Shaver, who was unarmed, at a hotel in January.

The material released did not include officers' body camera video from the scene.

Shaver, 26, died after being shot in a hallway outside his room at a Mesa La Quinta Inn & Suites on Jan. 18. Brailsford was charged with one count of second-degree murder in a direct complaint by the County Attorney's Office on March 4.

Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery said body-camera footage obtained from the officer was used in his office's review of the case. The fatal shooting was the result of unjustified deadly force, Montgomery said.

The county attorney's complaint stated Brailsford was "manifesting an extreme indifference to human life recklessly causing the death of another."

Shaver's widow, Laney Sweet, said earlier this month that she had grown more and more frustrated by the lack of details made available to the public, including the circumstances surrounding her husband's death, two months after it occurred. They are the parents of two young girls.

Show Thumbnails
Show Captions

"I can't bring him back, but I will fight for justice for him," Sweet said. "My kids are absolutely heartbroken and I can't fix it."

Court records indicate Shaver could have been intoxicated at the time of his death and may not have understood what police were asking.

Officers were called to the La Quinta Inn shortly after 9 p.m. when guests at the pool reported seeing a person with a gun in a fifth-story window, police said.

Officers arrived at Shaver's hotel room and found him with an unidentified woman, whom Sweet said was visiting with a male colleague who had stepped outside to call his wife.

An unarmed Shaver and the woman were ordered to leave the hotel room and were then told to get on their hands and knees into the hallway, the county attorney's office said. The woman crawled toward the officers and was apprehended without incident.

"Shaver was cooperative, but sometimes confused by the commands and because of his possible intoxication," the report said. "The sergeant told Shaver that if he put his hands behind his back then he would be shot."

Records indicate Shaver was shot by Brailsford as Shaver made a motion with his right hand toward his waistline, possibly to pull his shorts up as they were sagging, the report said. Shaver was declared dead at the scene.

Investigators later found two pellet guns in Shaver's room, police said.

An autopsy report on Shaver has not yet been made public.

On March 21, the Mesa Police Department announced it had terminated Brailsford. Brailsford had 14 days to appeal the decision by Mesa Police Chief John Meza.

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1Mzr9VV

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/1PE6F93 Man fatally shot by Ariz. police officer begged for life via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/21TN1wS

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

CNBC just collected your password and shared it with marketers

An exercise in password security went terribly wrong, security experts say.

cnbc password sharing

CNBC withdrew a story from its website Tuesday that described good password practices after a tool included in the piece actually collected and exposed the passwords.

Credit: CNBC

CNBC inadvertently exposed peoples' passwords after it ran an article Tuesday that ironically was intended to promote secure password practices.

The story was removed from CNBC's website shortly after it ran following a flurry of criticism from security experts. Vice's Motherboard posted a link to the archived version.

Embedded within the story was a tool in which people could enter their passwords. The tool would then evaluate a password and estimate how long it would take to crack it.

A note said the tool was for "entertainment and educational purposes" and would not store the passwords.

That turned out not to be accurate, as well as having other problems.

Adrienne Porter Felt, a software engineer with Google's Chrome security team, spotted that the article wasn't delivered using SSL/TLS (Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security) encryption.

SSL/TLS encrypts the connection between a user and a website, scrambling the data that is sent back and forth. Without SSL/TLS, someone one the same network can see data in clear text and, in this case, any password sent to CNBC.

"Worried about security? Enter your password into this @CNBC website (over HTTP, natch). What could go wrong," Felt wrote on Twitter. "Alternately, feel free to tweet your password @ me and have the whole security community inspect it for you."

The form also sent passwords to advertising networks and other parties with trackers on CNBC's page, according to Ashkan Soltani, a privacy and security researcher, who posted a screenshot.

The companies that received copies of the passwords included Google's DoubleClick advertising service and Scorecard Research, an online marketing company that is part of comScore.

Despite saying the tool would not store passwords, traffic analysis showed it was actually storing them in a Google Docs spreadsheet, according to Kane York, who works on the Let's Encrypt project.

"The 'submit' button loads your password into a @googledocs spreadsheet!," York wrote.

In an interview over email, York said he has written some macros for Google Docs and recognized the domain "script.google.com."

He watched what happened after a password was submitted using the developer tools in Google's Chrome browser. He saw this: {result: "success", row: 1285}.

"Specifically, that 'row' increased by one each time I clicked the button," York said. "I was pretty sure that they were inserting the rows into a spreadsheet.

Luckily, the spreadsheet was marked as private, so it wouldn't have been accessible to the public.

Efforts to reach CNBC and the author of the story were not immediately successful.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/2323Tny CNBC just collected your password and shared it with marketers via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1Rqr478

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Gun shop owner refuses to sell gun to eligible customer, possibly prevents mass shooting

Gun shop owner refuses sale, possibly prevents mass shooting. © Miguel Schincariol/AFP/Getty Images) Gun shop owner refuses sale, possibly prevents mass shooting.

An Ohio gun shop owner refused to sell a gun to a man, despite the potential customer having cleared background checks. Now some are saying that in doing so, shop owner John Downs might have foiled plans for a mass shooting.

James Howard, 25, withdrew from his classes at Ohio University last Monday and allegedly assaulted an assistant hockey coach before driving to Downs' store. Downs, however, turned him away. "Just the look in his eye... there was something about him. I don't know. You really can't explain it. He was going to do something. He was going to do something," Downs told CBS News.

Howard returned to the gun store later that same day but Downs locked the door and had a customer call 911. The police later found Howard's car with a gun in the back seat at a Walmart; Howard was in the process of purchasing almost 50 rounds of 20-gauge shot gun shell ammunition.

Hocking County Sherriff Lanny North told CBS he believed Downs' gut reaction might have saved lives. "We don't know what he may have prevented," North said.

Howard, who has a history of mental illness, is being held on $125,000 bond for the possession of a firearm while allegedly being drug dependent or in danger of becoming so, as well as for reportedly purchasing his firearm by making false statements on his background check form.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/22O4ahq Gun shop owner refuses to sell gun to eligible customer, possibly prevents mass shooting via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1RKg6oZ

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Cruise line charges man $853 ‘rebooking fee’ when wife dies before cruise

LOVELAND, Colo. -- A Colorado man who had just lost his wife of 45 years was dealt another painful blow when he received an $853 charge from Viking River Cruises because his wife wasn't going on the prepaid trip.

Tom's wife, Marilyn, died in December after a brief battle with cancer. She was 66.

"It helps when you talk about her. I still talk about her like she's here," Ast told KDVR.

On her deathbed, Marilyn told Tom to go on the cruise without her. Initially he was hesitant, but he decided to go on the trip with family and friends who could share in remembering Marilyn.

Tom contacted the cruise company to tell them Marilyn had passed away and he was planning to go on the trip alone. That's when things got even worse for Tom.

"I want the same excursions, the same room. The same everything," Ast said.

A few days later, he received an email that felt like a punch in the gut -- an $853 bill for "rebooking fees."

"They said it was a rebooking because her name was taken off. That was their policy," Ast said.

At one point, he was told if he didn't pay the rebooking fee, he would lose the money he already paid for the $11,000 cruise.

After getting nowhere with the cruise line, Tom Ast contacted KDVR. The TV station contacted the cruise line and Tom received an email a week later that stated they will be refunding the $853 rebooking fee.

Ast said he is now able to look forward to the cruise after putting this incident behind him.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/eA8V8J Cruise line charges man $853 'rebooking fee' when wife dies before cruise via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1SkuBAk

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

The University of California has been admitting thousands of students from out-of-state with lower grades and test scores than state residents as a way to raise cash, a state audit released Tuesday reveals

The University of California has been admitting thousands of students from out of state with lower grades and test scores than state residents as a way to raise cash, a state audit released Tuesday reveals.

In the last three years, nearly 16,000 nonresident undergraduates — about 29 percent of those admitted — have won spots at the coveted public university with grade-point averages and scores below the median of admitted Californians, according to the 116-page audit. The report criticizes university practices it says undermine state residents' access to UC in favor of nonresidents, who pay about three times the basic tuition and fees of in-state students: $38,108 versus $13,400.

The state's Master Plan for Higher Education says UC should admit only nonresidents who are at least as qualified as the "upper half of residents who are eligible for admission," according to the report from State Auditor Elaine Howle.

But in 2011, UC changed that threshold so that nonresidents only had to "compare favorably" with residents, the audit notes.

Financial incentive

"The Master Plan is the commitment that California made to high school students and families that if they work hard, they'll have the opportunity to an education at UC," Howle said. "The problem is that UC campuses have an incentive to bring in nonresidents — and that's hurting California high school graduates who want to go to UC."

In 2008, the regents began encouraging nonresident enrollment by letting campuses keep the extra tuition money brought in by those students instead of sharing it with other campuses, the audit found. As a result, enrollment of nonresidents more than quadrupled in the last decade, while that of California students rose by 10 percent — despite a 52 percent increase in applications.

Howle is recommending that the Legislature limit the number of nonresidents UC can enroll — and already received a swift and enthusiastic response.

Legislation coming

Two lawmakers — Assemblywomen Kristin Olsen, R-Modesto (Stanislaus County), and Catharine Baker, R-San Ramon, say they will introduce a bill to do just that, and to require higher admission standards for nonresident students.

But it's unclear whether UC could be compelled to comply. Unlike the California State University system, UC is autonomous.

In her report, Howle urges UC to restore its prior admissions criteria. Yet, UC is unlikely to agree.

In her lengthy rebuttal to the audit, included as part of the report, UC President Janet Napolitano notes that the university has enrolled more California students than it receives funding for from the state, and calls the claim that UC is undermining resident applicants "unfounded."

UC also responded with its own report, "Straight Talk on Hot-Button Issues: UC Admissions, Finances, and Transparency 2016," that says "UC policies overwhelmingly favor California residents" and points out that the admission rate for in-state applicants is higher than that of nonresidents.

In her audit rebuttal, Napolitano writes: "If anything has constrained the enrollment of California students, it has been reductions in state funding. Nonresidents pay the full cost of their education — and more."

Common argument

It's an argument made often by UC officials. But the audit says UC's failure to reduce its costs — not reduced state funding — is at the heart of its troubles. The audit focuses on UC's generosity with raises and says that between 2005 and 2015, the university decreased spending on salaries just once: when it furloughed employees in the 2009-10 academic year.

It saved $236 million at the time — but lost that advantage a year later by spending another $526 million on salaries, the audit says. It also found that UC executives tend to earn more than other executives in the state, including the governor.

Earns more than Brown

Gov. Jerry Brown earns $169,559, compared with Napolitano's $570,000, says the report. And while the chief investment officers for the State Teachers' Retirement System and the State Public Employees' Retirement System each earn just above $400,000, UC's investment officer earns $615,000.

"So the explanations from the university don't ring true," Howle said.

UC's rationale for why it needs additional state funding irritated Assemblyman Mike Gipson, D-Carson (Los Angeles County), and prompted him to call for the audit, which took about a year and cost nearly $400,000.

"I'm thrilled that I did it. But I'm embarrassed and upset this audit has revealed this tremendous disparity" between residents and nonresidents, said Gipson, who has a son waiting to hear if he got accepted by UC. "It's a form of discrimination against California students that UC would accept a lower standard for nonresidents, but maintain a higher one for Californians."

Another disparity

He pointed to another disparity revealed in the audit. UC guarantees admission to all California public high school seniors who score in the top 12.5 percent of their class, though not to the campus of their choice. Those who are rejected by their favored campus are referred to UC Merced, which most students reject in turn, the audit found.

By contrast, UC grants nonresidents their first choice of campus, the audit found. As a result, it says, nonresidents are also displacing residents in the most popular majors, such as business, engineering and social science.

'Entirely unfounded'

UC responds that its approach nevertheless guarantees a place at UC for every qualified California applicant. "Even in the leanest of budget years ... UC has continued to offer admission to every California applicant who meets our criteria," Napolitano told Howle. "To suggest ... that UC has 'disadvantaged' California students is entirely unfounded."

Nanette Asimov is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: nasimov@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @NanetteAsimov

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/1V2zuCV The University of California has been admitting thousands of students from out-of-state with lower grades and test scores than state residents as a way to raise cash, a state audit released Tuesday reveals via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/25uOwGA

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe

Barack Obama: 'drug addiction is a health problem, not a criminal problem'

Speaking at a drug abuse summit in Atlanta, the US president committed to tackling heroin and prescription opioid epidemic with prevention and treatment

Obama speaking at a National Rx Drug Abuse and Heroin Summit in Atlanta, Georgia on 29 March 2016.
Obama speaking at a National Prescription Drug Abuse and Heroin Summit in Atlanta, Georgia on 29 March 2016. Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

Barack Obama committed Tuesday to take on America's growing heroin and prescription opioid epidemic by devoting resources to prevention and treatment, rather than to the "war on drugs" policies of the last few decades.

"For too long we've viewed drug addiction through the lens of criminal justice," Obama said at a conference in Atlanta. "The most important thing to do is reduce demand. And the only way to do that is to provide treatment – to see it as a public health problem and not a criminal problem."

The president said he hoped his participation in the panel – part of the "National Prescription Drug Abuse Heroin Summit" this week – would draw attention to the shift in approach, exemplified by a series of efforts aiming $116m at treatment that the administration laid out earlier in the day.

"When I show up, usually cameras do too," Obama said. "My hope is that it provides a greater spotlight to help solve this problem."

CNN chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta, who moderated the discussion, said the aim of the panel was to "focus on a path forward – on solutions" to the epidemic, which claimed 28,647 lives in 2014, a four-fold increase in opioid overdoses since 2000, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Others in the panel included Crystal Oertle and Justin Luke Riley, two recovering addicts who now help others, and Baltimore Health Commissioner Leana Wen. Obama referred to fixes needed in insurance, healthcare, and federal and state governments to stem the increase in addiction, which he said would not only help addicts but save the societal costs of their addiction.

Oertle recounted using heroin in the bathroom while her two children were at school. Wen told a story of sending an addict back to the streets when treatment was unavailable, only to see him later die of an overdose in the emergency room.

Wen said that care for addicts is currently often unavailable. "One of the worst realizations as a doctor is that you can't help someone … it's inhumane and ineffective," she said.

Oertle said her recovery depends on buprenorphine, a drug that combats opiate addiction, counseling, and helping others.

Obama's plan introduced earlier in the day includes a proposed Health and Human Services Department (HHS) rule that would allow qualified doctors to increase the number of patients to whom they can prescribe buprenorphine from 100 to 200.

It also touted $94m in "new funding" that the department of health and human services released earlier this month, so that 271 community health centers could expand "medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorders in underserved communities." This funding could result in the centers treating 124,000 new patients, according to the White House. The plan also included $11m for states to distribute naloxone, a drug that reverses opioid overdoses.

Obama also highlighted a nearly completed HHS rule that would treat substance abuse and mental health services like medical and surgical benefits under Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) programs. The White House said this could affect more than 23 million people.

Michael Collins, deputy director of national affairs at the Drug Policy Alliance, said the increased focus on helping addicts rather than interdicting drugs and incarcerating dealers continues Obama's commitment to "doing more than previous administrations to roll back the war on drugs."

Obama's plan "build(s) on" his call last month for an additional $1.1bn in congressional funding to fight the growing public health problem, according to the White House.

But Obama made clear in his remarks to the panel that "those $1.1bn are still not allocated. Until the money comes through it's just an idea." He warned: "if we don't invest in this, we're going to keep on being penny wise and pound foolish."

He said addiction has historically not been viewed as a public health problem, in part because it was viewed as affecting "the poor and minorities."

"It was a seen as a character flaw, and 'not our problem.' But the way we have looked at cigarettes as a public health problem, and traffic fatalities as a public health problem, if you take the same approach here, it can make a difference."

Let's block ads! (Why?)



http://ift.tt/21SCTo4 Barack Obama: 'drug addiction is a health problem, not a criminal problem' via top scoring links : news http://ift.tt/1RxLbNi

IFTTT

Put the internet to work for you.

Turn off or edit this Recipe